Skip to main content

Discrepancies

Okay, I've decided to start posting a little weekly segment I like to call Discrepancies, in which I will explore those obscure little things in life that just don't make sense. You know the type; those things that happen to catch your attention every now and then that make go, "hmmm, I wonder what that's all about," then you go on about your business and never really give it a second thought. Well guess what, I am going to talk about those things once a week. I may not have answers for them, but feel free to take it upon yourself to research them and leave a comment.

Disclaimer: I hold no responsibility for people who take it upon themselves to find answers to my esoteric postulations. If you feel you are taking up too much of your own precious time trying to resolve one of these mysteries, that's your problem. Get a life. These posts (and by "these" I of course mean Discrepancies, the rest of my posts are of course to be held in the highest regard of authenticity and philosophical debate; i.e., take the rest seriously) are meant for entertainment purposes only. They are not to be taken internally or applied to sensitive areas of the body or mind.

Today's post: Pepsi One's Nutrition Facts or Fiction?

Something I noticed about Pepsi One's nutritional information is that the serving size of course varies between the 12 oz can, the 2 liter bottle, and the 20 oz bottle. The can states that the serving size is "1 can" (12 oz), while the two bottles state that a serving size is in fact "8 oz". But what doesn't change is the amount of calories. The calorie count for a 12 oz can is exactly the same as the calorie count for an 8 oz serving as suggested by the bottles. How can that be? If following the 8 oz calorie guide, the 12 oz can should be worth either 1.5 servings or 1.5 calories. Or, if you follow the can's guide, the calorie count for the bottles' 8 oz serving suggestions should be 0.667 calories.

Is Pepsi getting lazy, or are they obscuring the facts in an attempt stay true to Pepsi One's one calorie assertion? You be the judge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aha! A New Nine Inch Nails Video . . .

OK, I know I complained about the blog videos in the past, but I got curious and clicked over to check out the website that hosts them . . . you know, to see what was there. Well, I came across the new Nine Inch Nails video for the song "Only." After watching it, I decided I had to share it with everyone because it reminded me of a music video from the '80s by Aha (sp.?). You know the one I'm talking about--unless you're too young to have seen it, let alone remember it.--it was "Take on Me." Obviously the music and sentiment share nothing in common, but the style and medium of the video have an interesting parallel. Both depict being trapped in an alternate plain of existence visible to and of physical reality, but seperated and sharply divided from it--the inner fantasy world juxtaposed and competing with reality. Anyway, enjoy! (Video No Longer Available) Cheers-Thanksalot!

Penguins Are People, too

Just got the latest issue of Out magazine and while thumbing through the usual spread of young and impossibly fit models hawking ridiculously priced fashion, gadgets, and the latest and trendiest in "must-haves", I came across a story that was (pull out the puke bucket) actually heart-warming. Ironically, the story takes place in the refrigerated section of New York's Central Zoo, where a pair of special penguins have proven that being gay really is going to the birds. Meet Roy and Silo, a pair of chinstrap penguins. Roy and Silo met during the 1998 breeding season and paired off for life as many species of penguin are wont to do. Nothing unusual here, save one small detail: both are male penguins. Gay penguins are nothing new. The are several paired same sex penguins at the Berlin Zoo in Germany. The Gay penguins there have gotten so famous in their homeland that there were protests when zoo keepers attempted ways of making the homo-ice-birds go for members of the oppos...